ArticleStatistics in medicine2026
Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis With One or Two Continuous Outcomes Measured at Multiple Time Points Using Gaussian Random Walks With Drift.
Article in Statistics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis With One or Two Continuous Outcomes Measured at Multiple Time Points Using Gaussian Random Walks With Drift.Statistics in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials is traditionally conducted on a single outcome measured at one time point. However, many trials also feature a secondary outcome and both outcomes may have been reported at multiple time points. Existing network meta-analysis methods for synthesizing continuous outcome data from such trials focus on either the longitudinal data aspect or the multiple outcomes aspect, but not on both simultaneously. In this paper, we present two Bayesian network meta-analysis models that account for the correlation of outcome measurements over time using Gaussian random walks with drift. The first model is suitable for a single continuous outcome measured at multiple time points, while the second model extends the first model to allow incorporation of a second outcome through cointegration of random walks. A simulation study to evaluate several statistical properties of these models is conducted. The results indicate that both proposed models produce unbiased estimates of relative treatment effect and drift parameters, as well as reasonable coverage. Furthermore, in some scenarios, using the cointegration model yields small gains in precision over using the single outcome model. Based on various performance measures, both proposed models also outperform an existing random walk network meta-analysis model previously used by investigators to synthesize osteoarthritis trials data. The proposed models are illustrated with an application to trials evaluating treatments for knee and hip osteoarthritis. Both models are useful additions to existing tools available to investigators undertaking a network meta-analysis of continuous outcome data at multiple time points.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.