ArticleStatistics in medicine2026
Adaptive Seamless Phase II/III Randomization Test Considering Treatment Group Selection Based on Short-Term Binary Outcomes.
Article in Statistics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Adaptive Seamless Phase II/III Randomization Test Considering Treatment Group Selection Based on Short-Term Binary Outcomes.Statistics in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recently, adaptive seamless phase II/III designs (ASDs) have gained attention because they improve the efficiency of drug development. In an ASD, a phase II trial, which explores the dose-response relationships and identifies treatments for the phase III trial, is combined with a phase III trial, which aims to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of the selected treatment arms in a single trial. This study focused on ASD, which selects treatment groups based on the short-term outcomes observed early in the trial, and involves a confirmatory outcome as the long-term outcome. The method based on the combination test, which considers treatment group selection based on short-term outcomes, tends to be conservative. In other words, it controls the type I error rate more strictly than necessary as the correlation decreases among outcomes in phases II and III. To address this issue, we proposed an adaptive seamless phase II/III randomization test that can appropriately consider the correlation between outcomes based on a randomization distribution, where phase II has a binary outcome and phase III has overall survival. Based on the simulation study, the proposed method improved conservatism owing to the correlation among outcomes and controlled the type I error rate around the nominal level. In addition, the power of this method tended to be higher than that of the method based on the combination test in most scenarios. Overall, the proposed method can increase the probability of trial success compared with conventional phase III designs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.