ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2026
Analysis of Keratoconus-Related Phenotypes in Two Pcsk1 Mouse Models.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Previously, a variant within the Pcsk1 gene was found to segregate with the keratoconus (KC) phenotype in whole genome sequencing of a four-generation family. We aimed to evaluate a potential relation between the Pcsk1 gene and corneal phenotype in mouse models. Methods: Two strains of Pcsk1 mice, one with a knockout (KO) and one with an N222D point mutation, were bred. Central corneal thickness (CCT) was determined using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) in PC1/3+/+ (n = 12), PC1/3+/K^ (n = 14), PC1/3K^/K^ (n = 5), PC1+/+ (n = 8), PC1+/ N222D (n = 15), and PC1 N222D / N222D (n = 7) mice at 3 and 6 months of age. Pachymetry maps were generated using the Mouse Corneal Analysis Program (MCAP) to process OCT images. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining using corneal sections from these animals were used to examine morphological changes. Results: No significant differences in corneal CCT, pachymetry, or morphology were observed among any of the mutant mice compared with their control littermates. Conclusions: In this setting, neither the N222D point mutation nor the Pcsk1 KO affected the corneal phenotype in two mouse models. The Pcsk1 gene could contribute to keratoconus when paired with additional genetic and environmental factors, not included in this study. Translational Relevance: Genetic factors are known to contribute to the pathogenesis of keratoconus. Although a variant in the Pcsk1 gene has been shown to segregate with keratoconus in a family, there is yet no evidence of Pcsk1 gene mutation correlating with pathogenic corneal phenotype in mouse models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.