ArticleThe Journal of animal ecology2026
Generation cycles in experimental populations of a multivoltine insect.
Article in The Journal of animal ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Generation cycles in experimental populations of a multivoltine insect.The Journal of animal ecology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Some animals exhibit large-amplitude fluctuations with periods close to their generation length. These fluctuations can be caused by seasonal environmental influences, scheduled pesticide applications, or ecological factors such as intraspecific regulation and consumer-resource interactions. While theory provides various mechanisms for how environmental and ecological factors might generate generational fluctuations, there has never been a field experiment testing the relative contributions of seasonal demographic synchronisation and intraspecific regulation to generation cycles in natural populations. The smaller tea tortrix, Adoxophyes honmai, is a serious pest of tea plants and a temperate multivoltine insect that undergoes 3-5 large-amplitude generation cycles each year under natural conditions in Japan. Theory suggests that these fluctuations may represent limit cycles driven by asymmetric intraspecific interference, where older larvae directly affect younger ones. However, in the field, these populations also experience strong seasonality and periodic insecticide applications that are thought to either generate or modify these fluctuations. We conducted a replicated field-cage experiment on the tortrix populations to manipulate the initial degree of stage synchrony and the timing of introduction. The experiment included four treatments contrasting pulsed versus continuous age structures at the onset of spring, along with two introduction timings separated by 20 days (approximately half a generation time). We minimised artificial interventions, such as harvesting and insecticide application, as well as the effect of natural enemies while allowing meteorological influences during the season. To compare the field-cage experiment results with theoretical predictions, we constructed an age-structured population model featuring asymmetric larval interference. We executed simulations using the same introduction scenarios as in the field-cage experiment. We observed the emergence of clear generational cycles in all treatments of the field-cage even in the absence of any initial demographic synchrony. This suggests an internal mechanism regulating population cycles, possibly intraspecific interference. However, the generational cycles in the field-cage were synchronised across treatments and with outer field populations. The results from the field-cage experiment and simulation analyses indicate that external environmental factors, such as precipitation, acted as a pacemaker for the generational cycles created by the internal regulatory mechanism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.