Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41636125›Full record

ArticleJournal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS2026

A diffusion model analysis of task set inertia and task set reconfiguration in ADHD.

Christina O Hlutkowsky, Xu Yan, Zvi R Shapiro, Jason S Feldman, Cynthia Huang-Pollock

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christina O HlutkowskyDepartment of Psychology, https://ror.org/04p491231The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-8322-3451
Xu YanDepartment of Psychology, https://ror.org/04p491231The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Zvi R ShapiroDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Jason S FeldmanLifespan: A Center for Psychological Services, Westlake Village, CA, USA.
Cynthia Huang-PollockDepartment of Psychology, https://ror.org/04p491231The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSwitching is one of three primary executive functions alongside inhibitory control and updating but remains relatively understudied in childhood attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) compared to investigations into working memory and inhibitory control deficits. Where extant literature in adults suggests that switch costs are due to a combination of task set inertia and task set reconfiguration costs, it is not clear which of these is most relevant to explaining ADHD-related atypicalities in performance.

methodsChildren with (

resultsConsistent with the switching literature in adults, switch costs for children were due to a combination of both task set inertia (reduced drift rate) as well as slower task set reconfiguration (

conclusionsThis study contributes to a growing literature finding that the performance deficits in children with ADHD across executive and non-executive function tasks are related to lower-level perceptual decision-making weaknesses that have downstream effects on higher-order processing.

Indexed as

Attention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityCognition DisordersExecutive FunctionInhibition, PsychologicalModels, PsychologicalChildCuesFemaleHumansMaleNeuropsychological TestsReaction Timeasymmetric switchattention deficit-hyperactivity disorderchildrendrift rateSwitchingTer

Identifiers

PMID41636125
PMCPMC12888083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.