Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41635941›Full record

ArticleResearch synthesis methods2026

Conducting evidence synthesis and developing evidence-based advice in public health and beyond: A scoping review and map of methods guidance.

Ani Movsisyan, Kolahta Asres Ioab, Jan William Himmels, Gina Loretta Bantle, Andreea Dobrescu, Signe Flottorp, Frode Forland, Arianna Gadinger, Christina Koscher-Kien, Irma Klerings and 4 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Research synthesis methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Ani MovsisyanInstitute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology (IBE), Chair of Public Health and Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, https://ror.org/05591te55LMU Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6121-8317
Kolahta Asres IoabInstitute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology (IBE), Chair of Public Health and Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, https://ror.org/05591te55LMU Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4002-1177
Jan William Himmelshttps://ror.org/046nvst19Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Norway.
Gina Loretta BantleInstitute for Evidence in Medicine, Medical Centre, Faculty of Medicine, https://ror.org/0245cg223University of Freiburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0503-6074
Andreea DobrescuDepartment for Evidence-based Medicine and Evaluation, https://ror.org/03ef4a036University for Continuing Education Krems, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0427-3714
Signe Flottorphttps://ror.org/046nvst19Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Norway.
Frode Forlandhttps://ror.org/046nvst19Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Norway.
Arianna GadingerDepartment for Evidence-based Medicine and Evaluation, https://ror.org/03ef4a036University for Continuing Education Krems, Austria.
Christina Koscher-KienDepartment for Evidence-based Medicine and Evaluation, https://ror.org/03ef4a036University for Continuing Education Krems, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2158-962X
Irma KleringsDepartment for Evidence-based Medicine and Evaluation, https://ror.org/03ef4a036University for Continuing Education Krems, Austria.
Joerg J MeerpohlInstitute for Evidence in Medicine, Medical Centre, Faculty of Medicine, https://ror.org/0245cg223University of Freiburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1333-5403
Barbara Nussbaumer-StreitDepartment for Evidence-based Medicine and Evaluation, https://ror.org/03ef4a036University for Continuing Education Krems, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7622-843X
Brigitte StrahwaldInstitute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology (IBE), Chair of Public Health and Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, https://ror.org/05591te55LMU Munich, Germany.
Eva A RehfuessInstitute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology (IBE), Chair of Public Health and Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, https://ror.org/05591te55LMU Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4318-8846

Funding

European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective public health decision-making relies on rigorous evidence synthesis and transparent processes to facilitate its use. However, existing methods guidance has primarily been developed within clinical medicine and may not sufficiently address the complexities of public health, such as population-level considerations, multiple evidence streams, and time-sensitive decision-making. This work contributes to the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control initiative on methods guidance development for evidence synthesis and evidence-based public health advice by systematically identifying and mapping guidance from health and health-related disciplines.Structured searches were conducted across multiple scientific databases and websites of key institutions, followed by screening and data coding. Of the 17,386 records identified, 247 documents were classified as 'guidance products' providing a set of principles or recommendations on the overall process of developing evidence synthesis and evidence-based advice. While many were classified as 'generic' in scope, a majority originated from clinical medicine and focused on systematic reviews of intervention effects. Only 41 documents explicitly addressed public health. Key gaps included approaches for rapid evidence synthesis and decision-making and methods for synthesising evidence from laboratory research, disease burden, and prevalence studies.The findings highlight a need for methodological development that aligns with the realities of public health practice, particularly in emergency contexts. This review provides a key repository for methodologists, researchers, and decision-makers in public health, as well as clinical medicine and health care in Europe and worldwide, supporting the evolution of more inclusive and adaptable approaches to public health evidence synthesis and decision-making.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based MedicinePublic HealthDecision MakingEuropeEvidence GapsHumansResearch Designevidence-based adviceevidence-informed decision-makingevidence synthesismethods guidancepublic health

Identifiers

PMID41635941
PMCPMC12873621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.