ArticleClinical kidney journal2026
Development and validation of the suicide risk score: a novel suicide risk prediction tool for patients with end-stage kidney disease.
Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite the high suicide rates among patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), there is no suicide prediction model specifically designed for this vulnerable population. Herein, we aimed to develop and validate a novel suicide risk score for ESKD patients. Methods: We analyzed data from the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) of South Korea, including 251 819 patients aged above 18 years diagnosed with ESKD between 2007 and 2022 in South Korea. The mean follow-up duration was 6.6 years. The cohort was randomly divided into derivation (70%) and validation (30%) sets. Using multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression, key variables were incorporated to develop the suicide risk score, which was converted into a 48-point scoring system, which is composed of easily identifiable clinical parameters. Results: Among 176 273 patients in the derivation cohort, 1126 (0.64%) patients committed suicide. The suicide risk score demonstrated moderate discrimination in both the derivation (C-statistic, 0.694) and validation (C-statistic, 0.709) cohorts, with good calibration. In the validation cohort, patients scoring below 16, 17-32 and 33-48 had predicted 10-year suicide risk of 0.2%, 1.2% and 7.7%, respectively, while the observed 10-year risk were 0.3%, 0.8% and 3.9%. These findings highlight the model's ability to effectively stratify risk using routinely available clinical data. Conclusions: The suicide risk score is a significant advancement in suicide risk prediction for ESKD patients. It is based on simple, routinely collected clinical indicators and provides an actionable tool for risk stratification and early intervention in daily practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.