ArticleInternational journal of dentistry2026
Evaluation of Two-Body Wear of Nanocomposites With Different Filler Morphology and Composition Using White-Light Interferometry.
Article in International journal of dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluation of Two-Body Wear of Nanocomposites With Different Filler Morphology and Composition Using White-Light Interferometry.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The aim was to compare the two-body wear behavior of four nanocomposites used for enamel replacement. Materials and Methods: Nanocomposite specimens (Estelite Asteria [EA], Enamel Biofunction [EBF], Neospectra [NS], Clearfil Majesty [CM]; Results: CM exhibited a significantly higher VH compared to the other nanocomposites, both before and after aging. It also showed lower MVL, MWD, and SR than the other three tested nanocomposites. Conclusions: VH and wear behavior are significantly affected by the filler parameters of nanocomposites. Clinical Significance: This study may assist clinicians in selecting resin-based composite (RBC) for occlusal rehabilitation. Based on this in vitro study, CM exhibited a lower wear rate than the other tested RBCs; therefore, it is worth considering its use for patients with higher bite forces.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.