Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41635891›Full record

ArticleEndocrine oncology (Bristol, England)2026

To screen or not to screen: complexity of

Einas Mohamed, Rosalind Eeles, Terri McVeigh, Daniel Morganstein

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Endocrine oncology (Bristol, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Tumor risks and surveillance outcomes inEndocrine oncology (Bristol, England) · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Einas MohamedImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9852-6373
Rosalind EelesThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Terri McVeighThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Daniel MorgansteinThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Thyroid Unit, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Summary: Pathogenic germline variants in the genes encoding the various subunits of the succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) enzyme complex are strongly associated with hereditary phaeochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGLs). Germline pathogenic variants (PGVs) in the SDHA gene are also found in individuals with wild-type gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) and paragangliomas. However, the penetrance of SDHA variants is relatively low. Only a minority of carriers will develop tumours as a result of the genetic condition. As a result, careful clinical interpretation is therefore required to avoid unnecessary over-investigation or undue concern. Current national guidelines recommend that SDHA variants should only be considered actionable (that is, to lead to surveillance in the proband and family screening) if they are identified in individuals with a personal or family history of an SDHA-related tumour. Nevertheless, SDHA variants are increasingly detected as a result of whole genome sequencing or multigene panel testing. This emphasises the importance of clinical context when deciding on surveillance or family testing. We describe three carriers of germline Learning points: Germline

Indexed as

germlineGISTsSDHAsurveillancevariants

Identifiers

PMID41635891
PMCPMC12862130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.