ArticleBrain & spine2025
The role of routine cranial CT imaging in geriatric head trauma: a retrospective analysis from a level I trauma centre in Germany.
Article in Brain & spine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Geriatric patients with head trauma have an increased risk of intracranial injuries. Due to impaired clinical evaluability and the widespread antithrombotic use, cranial computertomography (cCT) is frequently performed. Research question: This study aims to determine the prevalence and risk factors for intracranial haemorrhage and to calculate the number needed to screen (NNS) for its detection in a geriatric cohort. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients aged ≥65 years presenting to a level I trauma centre in Germany between January 2020 and October 2024 after a head impact and undergoing cCT imaging. Results: Among 2474 patients, 62.9 % were aged ≥80 years and 56.1 % were female. Intracranial haemorrhage occurred in 9.3 %, with 1.5 % requiring surgery. Risk factors for intracranial haemorrhage included female gender (OR = 1.4; p = 0.014), impaired consciousness (OR = 3.5; p < 0.001), presentation via resuscitation room (OR = 6.5; p < 0.001) and cervical spine injury (OR = 2.2; p < 0.001). The NNS for detecting intracranial haemorrhage was 10.7 in patients aged ≥65 years and 11.4 in those aged ≥80 years. The NNS in patients without impaired consciousness was 19.2 for those aged ≥65 years and 20.5 for those aged ≥80 years. The NNS for surgical intervention was 65.1 in patients aged ≥65 years and 111.1 in those aged ≥80 years. Discussion and conclusion: Intracranial haemorrhage is a common consequence of head trauma in older patients. Despite its high frequency, routine cCT is crucial for timely identification of acute intracranial pathologies, with the low NNS highlighting its diagnostic value and justifying its widespread use to optimize patients' outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.