ReviewBrain & spine2025
Management and outcome of whole-spine epidural abscesses - institutional case series and systematic review.
Review in Brain & spine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- External Validation of the SITE Score for De Novo Spinal Infections: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Global spine journal · 2026Article
- Pan-Spinal Epidural Abcess: Multidisciplinary Management of a Rare and Life-Threatening Condition.Cureus · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Whole-spine epidural abscesses (WSEAs) are rare infections with potentially devastating neurological sequelae. As common treatment guidelines remain absent, this study aims to describe the management and resulting outcomes of WSEAs through an institutional case series and systematic literature review. Research question: What are the optimal management strategies for WSEAs based on current evidence? Methods: We retrospectively analyzed a series of WSEAs treated at our tertiary spine center (2009-2024) and conducted a systematic review using PubMed, Ovid, and Web of Science (1990-2024). Data on patient demographics, clinical presentation, bacteriology, diagnostics, treatment strategies, and outcomes were extracted. Statistical analyses included multivariate and risk-factor analysis. Results: We identified 48 patients (mean age 54 years, 69 % male), including four from our institutional series. Staphylococcus aureus was the most common pathogen (67 %). Five patients (10.4 %) received only conservative antibiotic treatment, primarily those with mild neurological deficits or severe comorbidities. Surgical intervention was performed in 43 patients (89.6 %), mainly utilizing skip-laminectomies (68.8 %) with catheter-based epidural irrigation. Favourable outcomes were comparable between surgical (86.1 %) and conservative (80.0 %) treatment ( Discussion and conclusion: Both surgical and conservative approaches can achieve favourable outcomes in selected WSEA cases. The strong correlation between initial and final neurological status emphasizes the importance of early diagnosis and targeted intervention. Skip-laminectomies with catheter-based irrigation appear effective while minimizing surgical morbidity. Conservative treatment may be considered in neurologically intact patients under close surveillance. Larger multicenter studies are needed to establish reliable treatment algorithms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.