ArticlePeerJ2026
Causal modelling of climate-fish-fisheries: confronting models with data.
Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding the interplay of environmental and anthropogenic drivers is essential to interpret past changes and anticipate future dynamics of marine fish stocks. Using Norwegian spring-spawning herring (NSSH) as a case study, we applied an iterative structured causal modelling framework combining causal knowledge analysis and inference-using structural equation models-to quantify the respective effects of climate and fisheries on stock biomass and catches. Initial simple models, grounded in prior ecological understanding, yielded implausible estimates when confronted with observational data, underscoring the necessity to treat data structure and content as integral to model design. We gradually incorporated multiple causal pathways, feedback loops, and confounders. Final models explained over 90% of observed variation in both biomass and catch and showed strong support for the roles of recruitment, prior biomass, and total allowable catch (TAC) advice. We found no causal effect of ocean climate variables (Relative Heat Content and Arctic Water Content) on year-to-year changes in NSSH biomass, nor of Spawning Stock Biomass on catches. Instead, catch levels were primarily governed by TAC advice and the degree of agreement between fishing nations. We conclude that reliable causal inference in ecological systems requires iterative model refinement, causal knowledge analysis, and explicit accounting for data structure. Adopting and transparently reporting this approach would benefit ecological studies used to support fisheries management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.