Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41635798›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025

CervSpineNet: a hybrid deep learning-based approach for the segmentation of cervical spinous processes.

Jay Sunil Sawant, Lama Moukheiber, Anupama Nair, Anubha Mahajan, Jaehui Byun, Ishwarya Pichaimani, Sangwook T Yoon, Christopher T Martin, Cassie S Mitchell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jay Sunil SawantLaboratory for Pathology Dynamics, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Lama MoukheiberLaboratory for Pathology Dynamics, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Anupama NairLaboratory for Pathology Dynamics, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Anubha MahajanLaboratory for Pathology Dynamics, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Jaehui ByunLaboratory for Pathology Dynamics, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Ishwarya PichaimaniLaboratory for Pathology Dynamics, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Sangwook T YoonDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Christopher T MartinDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Cassie S MitchellLaboratory for Pathology Dynamics, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.

Funding

Integrative predictive medicine to identify disease causes, develop cures, and optimize patient careR35GM152245 · NIGMS · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI Cassie S Mitchell · 2024 to 2026
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM152245
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Accurate segmentation of cervical spinous processes on lateral X-rays is essential for reliable anatomical landmarking, surgical planning, and longitudinal assessment of spinal deformity. However, no publicly available dataset provides pixel-level annotations of these structures, and manual delineation remains time-consuming and operator dependent. To address this gap, we curated an expert-labeled dataset of 500 cervical spine radiographs and developed CervSpineNet, a hybrid deep learning framework for automated spinous process segmentation. Methods: CervSpineNet integrates a transformer-based encoder to capture global anatomical context with a lightweight convolutional decoder to refine local boundaries. Training used a compound loss function that combines Dice, Focal Tversky, Hausdorff distance transform, and Structural Similarity (SSIM) terms to jointly optimize region overlap, class balance, structural fidelity, and boundary accuracy. The model was trained and evaluated on three dataset variants: original images, contrast-enhanced images using CLAHE, and augmented images. Performance was benchmarked against four baselines: U-Net, DeepLabV3+, the Segment Anything Model (SAM), and a text-guided SegFormer. Results: Across all experimental settings, CervSpineNet consistently outperformed competing methods, achieving mean Dice coefficients above 0.93, IoU values above 0.87, and SSIM above 0.98, with substantially lower HD95 distances. The model demonstrated strong agreement with ground truth, with global MAE ≈ 0.005, and maintained efficient inference times of 5-10 seconds per image. With a compact footprint of approximately 345 MB, CervSpineNet runs on standard clinical hardware and reduces manual annotation time by about 96%. Discussion: These results indicate that combining transformer-driven global context with convolutional boundary refinement enables robust and reproducible spinous process segmentation on lateral cervical radiographs. By pairing an expert-annotated dataset with a high-performing, computationally efficient model, this work provides a scalable foundation for AI-assisted cervical spine analysis, supporting rapid segmentation for surgical evaluation, deformity monitoring, and large-scale retrospective studies in both research and clinical practice.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceautomated musculoskeletal landmark detectioncervical spine segmentationcervical spinous process datasetdeep learning in radiologyhybrid transformer–CNN architecturemachine learningradiology workflow automation

Identifiers

PMID41635798
PMCPMC12862216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.