Healthcare professionals' perspectives on the reproductive management of young women with breast cancer: A qualitative study based on social-ecological system theory.

Jiajia Qiu, Jing Li, Lichen Tang, Ping Li, Mingxuan Cai, Chenxi Zhu

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

1citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

Psychological experiences of young end stage renal disease patients awaiting kidney transplantation: A qualitative study.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2025
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jiajia QiuDepartment of Nursing Administration, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Jing LiDepartment of Nursing Administration, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Lichen TangDepartment of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Ping LiDepartment of Nursing Administration, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Mingxuan CaiSchool of Nursing, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Chenxi ZhuSchool of Nursing, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To explore the perspectives of healthcare professionals involved in the reproductive management of young women with breast cancer based on social-ecological systems. Methods: A descriptive qualitative study was conducted. Purposive sampling was used to select 15 healthcare professionals from breast cancer specialties between January and June 2024. Face-to-face in-depth interviews were conducted. Interview data were analyzed using Colaizzi's content analysis method. Results: Three themes emerged from the data: the reproductive decision-making process needs to involve multiple parties; multiple supports should be provided during reproductive management; and reproductive management requires multi-system preparedness. Conclusions: From the patient's perspective, we should respect their will, consider family decisions, and strengthen learning abilities. From the professionals' perspective, we should improve the reproductive management awareness of healthcare professionals, their professional learning ability and their cancer reproductive consultation and communication abilities. At the organizational level, social resources could be integrated to provide multidisciplinary information and multi-dimensional emotional support to promote smooth reproductive decision-making in young patients with breast cancer to improve their quality of life.

Indexed as

Breast cancerHealthcare professionalQualitative researchReproductive managementSocial-ecological systems

Identifiers

PMID41635781

DOI10.1016/j.apjon.2025.100686

PMCPMC12861734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.