ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
The modulating role of sources of difficulty in interactive matchstick algebra.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Does Physical Interaction with Insight Problems Really Affect the Solution Rate?Journal of Intelligence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interactive problem solving has been proposed as an experimental manipulation that significantly increases the success of solving various matchstick algebra problems by allowing solvers to interact with physical representations of the problems. In contrast to this claim, we hypothesized that the influence of interactivity would vary based on the specific sources of difficulty inherent in the problems: perceptual chunks and cognitive constraints. We carried out a conceptual extended replication across three experimental series with conditions of varying degrees of interactivity, but failed to reproduce interactive solutions amongst our participants. A follow-up analysis of motor activity showed that the movements of the solvers did not contribute to chunk decomposition but significantly interfered with the relaxation of higher-level constraints. These findings suggest that motor activity can hinder performance when it does not align with the cognitive demands of the task. We therefore call for a more targeted and problem-specific understanding of how physical interaction contributes to restructuring in insight problem solving.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.