ArticleAI and ethics2026
Machine learning for precision medicine: promoting value considerations through perspective-taking hypothetical group design exercises.
Article in AI and ethics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Public concerns over the social and ethical consequences of artificial intelligence (AI) are well established. Despite ongoing efforts to respond, these concerns remain largely unresolved by either regulation or codes of ethics. In response, scholars have advanced ideas about how to better ground ethical awareness in practice. A key element of this grounding is fostering awareness of how one's actions can affect the welfare of others. We tested the effect of a group design exercise on whether and how AI developers considered the impact of their work on others, using perspective-taking as a "values lever"-a practice that prompts ethical reflection during the design process. We found that hypothetical scenarios set in three different contexts of AI research or building a tool for clinical use encouraged developers to take different perspectives. We specifically used an Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43681-025-00973-5.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.