Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41635721›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026

Innovative Refinements in Robotic-assisted Transoral Free Flap Inset Using Mini-pharyngotomy.

Nicole E Speck, Medea Rodriguez, Alexander Lunger, Pablo Pfister, Dirk J Schaefer, Maximilian Burger, John W Shuck, Rene D Largo, Tarek Ismail, Laurent Muller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nicole E SpeckFrom the Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, Aesthetic and Hand Surgery, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland.
Medea RodriguezFrom the Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, Aesthetic and Hand Surgery, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland.
Alexander LungerFrom the Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, Aesthetic and Hand Surgery, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland.
Pablo PfisterFrom the Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, Aesthetic and Hand Surgery, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland.
Dirk J SchaeferFrom the Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, Aesthetic and Hand Surgery, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland.
Maximilian BurgerFrom the Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, Aesthetic and Hand Surgery, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland.
John W ShuckDepartment of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Rene D LargoDepartment of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Tarek IsmailFrom the Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, Aesthetic and Hand Surgery, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland.
Laurent MullerDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) has revolutionized head and neck cancer treatment by offering minimally invasive access to challenging anatomical regions. The first TORS procedure was performed in 2003, using the da Vinci Surgical System to remove a vallecular cyst, demonstrating its feasibility in otolaryngology. In 2005, Hockstein et al advanced robotic applications for pharyngeal and laryngeal regions, making TORS a viable alternative to more invasive approaches, such as mandibulotomy for tumor resection. Initially used for small tumors, TORS has expanded to include larger tumors requiring free flap reconstruction for extensive oropharyngeal defects. Robotic surgery also continues to grow in other head and neck procedures, with increasing reports of robotic thyroidectomy and skull base procedures. As robotic techniques expand, challenges for reconstructive surgeons accustomed to open techniques may arise. It is imperative that plastic surgeons embrace new technology and innovate accordingly. This case series explored a novel, minimally invasive approach to transoral free flap inset and pedicle positioning using a nerve- and vessel-sparing mini-pharyngotomy. Four patients underwent robotic-assisted resection and free flap reconstruction, avoiding traditional mandibulotomy and lateral pharyngotomy, thus preserving critical structures such as the hypoglossal and lingual nerves. This method may reduce surgical morbidity, optimize pedicle transfer, and improve functional outcomes. All patients had successful reconstructions with no flap loss or fistulas, and follow-up ranged from 9 to 70 months. These findings suggest that robotic-assisted free flap inset with a mini-pharyngotomy is a safe, effective, and patient-centric alternative to conventional approaches in head and neck reconstruction.

Identifiers

PMID41635721
PMCPMC12863905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.