ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026
Innovative Refinements in Robotic-assisted Transoral Free Flap Inset Using Mini-pharyngotomy.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) has revolutionized head and neck cancer treatment by offering minimally invasive access to challenging anatomical regions. The first TORS procedure was performed in 2003, using the da Vinci Surgical System to remove a vallecular cyst, demonstrating its feasibility in otolaryngology. In 2005, Hockstein et al advanced robotic applications for pharyngeal and laryngeal regions, making TORS a viable alternative to more invasive approaches, such as mandibulotomy for tumor resection. Initially used for small tumors, TORS has expanded to include larger tumors requiring free flap reconstruction for extensive oropharyngeal defects. Robotic surgery also continues to grow in other head and neck procedures, with increasing reports of robotic thyroidectomy and skull base procedures. As robotic techniques expand, challenges for reconstructive surgeons accustomed to open techniques may arise. It is imperative that plastic surgeons embrace new technology and innovate accordingly. This case series explored a novel, minimally invasive approach to transoral free flap inset and pedicle positioning using a nerve- and vessel-sparing mini-pharyngotomy. Four patients underwent robotic-assisted resection and free flap reconstruction, avoiding traditional mandibulotomy and lateral pharyngotomy, thus preserving critical structures such as the hypoglossal and lingual nerves. This method may reduce surgical morbidity, optimize pedicle transfer, and improve functional outcomes. All patients had successful reconstructions with no flap loss or fistulas, and follow-up ranged from 9 to 70 months. These findings suggest that robotic-assisted free flap inset with a mini-pharyngotomy is a safe, effective, and patient-centric alternative to conventional approaches in head and neck reconstruction.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.