ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2025
Optimising clinical trial management in Spain: The CARABELA-Clinical trials framework integrating healthcare models and subject experiences.
Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical trials (CT) are the framework upon which novel treatments' safety and efficacy are assessed. The CARABELA-CT initiative aims to optimise Spanish CT procedures by improving efficiency, quality, and subject well-being. To this, it characterised CT healthcare models, identified improvement areas, proposed solutions, and gathered important insights from CT subjects. CARABELA-CT took a three-phase approach. Phase I involved CT healthcare models' characterisation, including all clinical investigation processes in Spain, across six pilot hospitals, identifying improvement areas and solutions. Phase II validated these findings, defining key healthcare quality indicators. Phase III focused on dissemination and implementation. Additionally, seven randomly invited CT subjects participated in a focus group to share their experiences regarding communication, coordination, and CT impact on quality of life. Three CT healthcare models were identified, distinguished according to access, infrastructure, and resources. Twelve improvement areas were defined, leading to 38 solutions addressing subject education, professional training, organisation, protocols, resources, and technology. Twenty-four healthcare quality indicators were established to monitor CT processes. Subject experiences highlighted the need for clearer communication, digitalised information, and improved subject support, and revealed the emotional and psychological benefits of CT participation, despite the challenges. CARABELA-CT provides a comprehensive framework to enhance Spanish CT processes. This initiative integrates potential solutions in improvement areas in CT development and the corresponding healthcare quality indicators, and prioritises subject experiences to foster efficiency, participant engagement, and a sustainable, patient-centric clinical research model. These findings contribute to the continuous improvement of CT management, ultimately optimising research execution and healthcare outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.