ArticleNPJ emerging contaminants2026
Nanoplastic concentration and potential transport in the Arctic Ocean.
Article in NPJ emerging contaminants, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plastic contamination in the Arctic originates from local anthropogenic activities and long-range transport mediated by oceanic and atmospheric circulation, with nanoplastics representing a major emerging concern. Yet, quantitative data on their environmental distribution remain scarce. Here, we present the first multi-matrix, multi-site, and multi-year assessment of nanoplastics distribution in the Arctic Ocean. We found that polystyrene, polypropylene, and polyethylene nanoplastics are widely distributed across different matrices from the Svalbard region to the central Arctic Ocean. The total concentrations of polystyrene and polypropylene ranging from 10 up to 900 ng L⁻¹. Coastal areas may be more influenced by local human activities, whereas remote regions are likely affected by atmospheric transport and inputs associated with the Transpolar Drift. The extent to which each source contributes remains uncertain and may vary spatially. Differences in distribution across environmental matrices were also observed, with higher concentrations in snow and surface ice than at the ice-sea interface. The sea ice act as a temporary reservoir and secondary source of nanoplastics through redistribution processes across the snow-ice-seawater interface. These findings indicate the necessity for multi-scale, multi-temporal, and multi-spatial investigations, which are crucial for understanding the sources, transport pathways, and environmental fate of nanoplastics within the Arctic ecosystem.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.