Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41635679›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2025

Research progress on multimodal data fusion in forest resource monitoring.

Ming Wang, Qian Zhang, Xin Liu, Jinmeng Zhang, Feng Yu, Xining Zhang, Ruifang Zhao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ming Wang *Institute of Data Science and Agricultural Economics, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing, China.
Qian Zhang *Institute of Data Science and Agricultural Economics, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xin LiuInstitute of Data Science and Agricultural Economics, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing, China.
Jinmeng ZhangInstitute of Data Science and Agricultural Economics, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing, China.
Feng YuInstitute of Data Science and Agricultural Economics, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xining ZhangInstitute of Data Science and Agricultural Economics, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing, China.
Ruifang ZhaoInstitute of Data Science and Agricultural Economics, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dynamic monitoring of forest resources is crucial for safeguarding global ecological security. However, traditional monitoring methods, limited by single data sources, struggle to meet the demands of refined management. The global forest loss area in 2024 surged by 80% compared with that in 2023, further highlighting the urgency of technological upgrading. Multimodal data fusion technology has emerged as a core solution by establishing an "air-space-ground" collaborative network integrating "satellite remote sensing (macro-scale) + UAV hyperspectral (meso-scale) + ground sensors (micro-scale)". This technology integrates multi-source heterogeneous data such as optical, radar, and LiDAR data, and achieves cross-modal information complementarity by combining traditional machine learning and deep learning. Based on the framework of "technical characteristics-scenario applications-challenge breakthroughs", this study systematically reviews the research progress from 2020 to 2025. Technically, a complete technology chain is established, covering data acquisition, data preprocessing (including key links such as "data cleaning-spatiotemporal registration-feature dimensionality reduction"), and multi-strategy fusion. Significant application effects have been achieved in scenarios including tree species classification, land resource monitoring, forest structure parameter estimation and ecological monitoring, as well as forest disaster monitoring and tree health assessment. Meanwhile, the study identifies key technical bottlenecks: in data acquisition, the accuracy of LiDAR point clouds in dense forest areas decreases by 15%-20%; in preprocessing, issues such as spatiotemporal registration errors and high annotation costs exist; in fusion strategies, the accuracy of early fusion decreases by 12% when the number of features exceeds 500 dimensions; in model deployment, the inference latency of edge devices increases by 20%-30%. The core contributions of this study are as follows: constructing a standardized "air-space-ground" data technology chain, proposing a scenario-adaptable fusion framework, and clarifying future directions such as model lightweighting and edge computing. These contributions provide support for the engineering application of this technology and promote the transformation of forestry monitoring from "experience-driven" to "intelligent data-driven".

Indexed as

deep learningforest resource monitoringfusion strategymultimodal data fusionpreprocessing

Identifiers

PMID41635679
PMCPMC12862072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.