ArticleActa clinica Croatica2025
CRITERIA FOR PRIMARY OR TWO-STAGE DIVERSION PROCEDURES IN COLON INJURIES: EXPERIENCE FROM A TERTIARY CARE CENTER IN MONTENEGRO.
Article in Acta clinica Croatica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Modern literature supports primary repair in a wide array of colon injury presentations. The aim of the study was to evaluate the validity of criteria for primary repair of colon injuries. The analysis involved 96 patients with colon injuries. Group 1 (62 patients) underwent the Stone and Fabian (S/F) criteria for primary repair, whereas group 2 (34 patients) underwent the following exclusion criteria for primary repair: significant peritonitis, edema/ischemia of a large area/multiple colonic segments, latent period >8 h, and intraoperative cardiorespiratory instability. The following variables were analyzed: demographic data, mechanism of injury, latent period, distribution of injuries, macroscopic intraoperative finding, and several trauma indices. The mean latent period was shorter in group 2 (1.3±1.1 h)
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.