Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41635660›Full record

ArticleActa clinica Croatica2025

TREATMENT METHODS AND ATTITUDES TOWARDS PRIMARY DYSMENORRHEA AMONG CROATIAN STUDENTS: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY.

Marta Horvat, Doroteja Pavan Jukić, Lovro Marinović, Danijel Bursać, Rosana Ribić, Marijana Neuberg, Dina Bursać

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta clinica Croatica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marta HorvatZagreb-West Health Center, Zagreb, Croatia.
Doroteja Pavan Jukić
Lovro Marinović
Danijel Bursać
Rosana Ribić
Marijana Neuberg
Dina BursaćDepartment of Oral Surgery, Zagreb University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to determine which treatment methods university students use to relieve menstrual pain. The study was conducted in April 2021 and included 861 female students at the University of Zagreb. Data were collected through an anonymous online questionnaire containing 22 questions regarding menstrual characteristics and pain management. The study found that 366 (42.5%) students asked advice from a healthcare professional regarding primary dysmenorrhea and pain management. Pharmacological methods were used by 780 (90.6%) and non-pharmacological methods by 648 (75.3%) students. Most commonly, students were advised to use these methods by their families (73.8% and 64.5%, respectively). The most common drug used to treat painful menstruation was ibuprofen (84.7%). Local application of heat (78.7%) and taking an antalgic position (75.2%) were the most common alternative methods for relieving pain. Students who perceived their pain to be more severe were usually more likely to seek advice from a health worker and use both pharmacological and non-pharmacological methods in pain management. Our study found that Croatian students were more likely to self-medicate than to seek advice from a health professional regarding painful menstruation. They use both pharmacological and non-pharmacological methods.

Indexed as

DysmenorrheaPainful menstruationPain managementSelf-medicationStudents

Identifiers

PMID41635660
PMCPMC12863286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.