ArticleActa clinica Croatica2025
REPEATIBILITY AND RELIABILITY OF KNEE JOINT ROTATIONAL LAXITY MEASUREMENTS WITH DOUBLE GONIOMETRY.
Article in Acta clinica Croatica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The results of existing studies on the range of motion in the knee joint rotation are contradictory. The best method for measuring knee rotation has not yet been found. The purpose of this study was to investigate the repeatability and reliability of knee joint rotational laxity measurement using two magnetic goniometers. Thirty healthy subjects (15 males and 15 females) aged between 20 and 32 years participated in the study. Internal and external rotation of the left and right knee joints were measured with double goniometry in the sitting position with 90° flexion of the knee. There was no statistically significant difference in measurements between first and second session. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for repeatability ranged from 0.812 to 0.858 and for reliability from 0.655 to 0.837. Within-subject coefficient of variation was less than 10%, standard error of measurement was between 1.4
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.