ReviewTranslational sports medicine2026
Which Protein-Based Dietary Supplements Most Effectively Enhance Fat-Free Mass and Strength Gains in Healthy Adults Undergoing Resistance Training? A Network Meta-Analysis.
Review in Translational sports medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Which Protein-Based Dietary Supplements Most Effectively Enhance Fat-Free Mass and Strength Gains in Healthy Adults Undergoing Resistance Training? A Network Meta-Analysis.Translational sports medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Various protein-based dietary supplements are widely used by individuals engaged in strength training to optimize gains in muscle strength and fat-free mass. However, gaps remain in the scientific literature regarding a comprehensive comparison-particularly the effectiveness of different types of supplemented proteins in healthy adults. This systematic review and network meta-analysis aimed to compare the effectiveness of protein-based dietary supplements, combined with strength training, on increasing muscle strength and fat-free mass in healthy adults. Methods: A network meta-analysis was conducted using randomized controlled trials evaluating different protein supplements combined with strength training. The outcomes assessed were muscle strength (primary) and fat-free mass (secondary). The search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, and Embase up to May 2024, with no restrictions on language or publication date. Results: A total of 78 studies were included, comprising 4755 participants across two outcomes and involving 13 types of protein supplements, plus placebo and control groups. Compared to placebo, for strength, collagen was the most effective supplement (SMD = 0.41; 95% CI: 0.09 to 0.73; Conclusion: Collagen and whey protein are the only protein supplements effective in enhancing strength training effects. Moreover, collagen shows a superior effect compared to whey protein for both outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.