ArticleRevista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT
Perception and acceptance of a multicomponent routine program of active breaks for office workers.
Article in Revista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Sedentary behavior in the workplace is associated with adverse health outcomes and decreased productivity. Active breaks have emerged as a promising strategy to mitigate these negative effects. Objectives: To evaluate the effects of active breaks on well-being, productivity, and physical activity levels among 93 remote office workers (aged 18-59). Methods: Participants completed standardized questionnaires before and after the intervention, which consisted of a multicomponent program with four stages: (1) educational lectures, (2) individualized guidance, (3) support groups, and (4) the use of a mobile application. Active breaks lasted 3-5 minutes and were performed four times per day at two-hour intervals. Results: Following the intervention, 95% of participants incorporated active breaks into their daily routine (p < 0.001). Significant improvements were observed in perceived energy levels (p < 0.001), stress reduction (p < 0.001), decreased frequency of lower back pain (p < 0.001), and sleep quality (p < 0.001). Additionally, 73% reported increased vitality and reduced stress, while 88.1% expressed high satisfaction with the new routine. Conclusions: The multicomponent active break program effectively reduced the negative impacts of sedentary behavior, enhancing well-being and productivity among remote workers. The intervention demonstrated feasibility and scalability, although further research is needed to support long-term implementation in occupational health policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.