ArticleInternational journal of sports physical therapy2026
Perceptions of Biomechanical Devices in Collegiate Baseball Pitchers and Training Staff: A Qualitative Study.
Article in International journal of sports physical therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Baseball players, coaches, and clinicians have sought to leverage biomechanical devices to inform training load and injury prevention. A novel biomechanical pitching sleeve and portable force plate have been proposed to track training load, kinetic, and kinematic data. The objective of this study was to identify the barriers and facilitators for use of wearable and portable biomechanical devices among elite baseball pitchers and training staff. Study design: Qualitative descriptive study nested within a pilot feasibility study. Methods: This study was conducted at participating team facilities. Collegiate baseball players, coaches, and support staff were recruited. Nine semi-structured focus groups/interviews were conducted using a qualitative guide book and transcribed verbatim. An abductive conventional content analysis was adopted to construct themes for barriers and facilitators for implementation of the novel biomechanical pitching sleeve and portable force plate. Results: Three themes emerged related to facilitators for the use of the devices. First, knowledge users valued individualized data-informed training. Second, athletes felt empowered to make training decisions through self-awareness. Third, users had a new appreciation for injury prevention strategies. Two themes emerged related to barriers for the use of the devices. First, the data interpretation imposed implementation challenges. Second, the addressing challenges in systemization and integration. Conclusions: This study provides insight into barriers and facilitators that may improve future implementation of wearable or portable biomechanical devices among players, coaches, and clinicians to aid in informing training regimens and injury prevention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.