ReviewPain reports2026
Human pain transcriptomics: lessons learned so far.
Review in Pain reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Disturbances in Central Sensitization Are Associated with Disease Severity and Alterations in Gene Expression Measured in the Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells of Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chronic pain is currently being viewed as a major public health epidemic, especially as there is a higher rate of chronic pain amongst US adults than for other chronic diseases like diabetes, depression, and hypertension. A better understanding of the mechanisms driving chronic pain is needed to develop new and effective analgesics. Animal models have traditionally been valuable tools in pain research, but there have been many setbacks in translating preclinical findings into new therapeutics. This has brought a new sense of urgency for a better understanding of chronic pain pathophysiology in humans. To address this gap, a comprehensive and systematic study of human nociceptive pathways, integrating molecular, cellular, and systems-level data is critical for identifying clinically relevant targets and improving translational success in pain therapeutics. Fortunately, this mission has currently been aided by current advances in the next-generation sequencing coupled with the increased availability of nociceptive tissues from patients with chronic pain. As such, we and others have just begun initial studies examining the transcriptomic changes occurring in the dorsal root ganglia of subjects with chronic pain. Transcriptomic analyses of dorsal root ganglia have so far examined painful conditions including radicular/neuropathic pain, diabetic painful neuropathy, and rheumatoid arthritis. Here, we describe what has been learned from these transcriptomic studies so far, which shows that additional multiomics-driven research is needed to fully understand and target human nociceptive processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.