Trial reportFrontiers in medicine2026
Tuina therapy plus resistance exercise vs. Tuina alone for mechanical neck pain: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Tuina and exercise therapy are widely used to treat mechanical neck pain (MNP), but evidence on their combined efficacy remains limited. This study evaluated the effectiveness of Tuina combined with resistance exercise (RE) versus Tuina alone in managing MNP. Methods: We conducted a 4-week, analyst-blinded, randomized controlled trial with 90 participants with MNP. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either Tuina Therapy plus RE (TTRE, Results: The mean age of the 90 enrolled patients was 26.4 years [standard deviation (SD), 3.1 and 49 (54.4%) were female]. The mean difference in VAS scores from baseline at week 4 for TTRE group was -4.2 (95% CI, -4.4 to -4.0). At week 4, the difference in VAS score was 0.5(95% CI, 0.30 to 0.77; Conclusion: In this study, participants with MNP in the TTRE group showed statistically greater improvements than those in the Tuina group in pain reduction, functional recovery, extension PSCM, and flexion CROM at week 4. TTRE may be considered a valuable option in the management of MNP. Clinical trial registration: We registered the trial with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2300068344; Registration Date: February 15, 2023) at http://www.chictr.org.cn.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.