ArticleJournal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America2025
Osteogenesis Imperfecta or Non-accidental Trauma? The Diagnostic Dilemma in Pediatric Fractures.
Article in Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Posterior spinal fusion with pedicle screw-based constructs in osteogenesis imperfecta: a systematic review of surgical and radiographic outcomes.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Pooled it
- Phenotypic Variability and Diagnostic Characteristics of Pediatric Osteogenesis Imperfecta: A 10-Year Multicenter Cohort Study from Three Tertiary Pediatric Hospitals in Bucharest, Romania.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In pediatric populations, unexplained fractures, particularly in non-ambulatory children, raise immediate concern for nonaccidental trauma (NAT). Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a rare genetic disorder marked by bone fragility, frequent fractures, and features like blue sclera. Distinguishing between these two entities remains a significant diagnostic challenge. Misdiagnosis of OI as NAT carries substantial medical, legal, and psychosocial consequences for families and underscores the need for accurate, timely diagnosis supported by multidisciplinary evaluation. We present a case of a six-month-old non-ambulatory male who presented with a left tibial spiral fracture and was initially considered to have been subject to NAT and was eventually diagnosed with OI. This case highlights several quality improvement opportunities, including missed documentation of key physical exam findings, misinformation about the nature of genetic testing, and delayed referral for genetic evaluation. This case underscores the importance of structured clinical pathways that prompt consideration of rare medical mimics like OI when evaluating suspected NAT. Radiographic differentiation alone is often insufficient and clinical clues such as scleral hue, fracture history, and family history must be integrated into the diagnostic process. Key Concepts: (1)Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) and non-accidental trauma (NAT) can present with overlapping clinical and radiographic features.(2)Classic metaphyseal lesions, often associated with NAT, may also be seen in OI.(3)A thorough history (family history), a physical exam (blue sclera), and genetic testing are essential for distinguishing OI from NAT to avoid misdiagnosis and inappropriate child protection interventions.(4)Delays in genetic evaluation and misinformation about testing can hinder timely diagnosis and management of OI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.