Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41635460›Full record

ReviewJournal of medicine and life2025

Engineering the mind-body medicine: making a case for a trauma-informed primary care system.

Satish Boregowda, Inga Eanes, Rodney Handy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of medicine and life, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Satish BoregowdaSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Inga EanesHope for Healing, Council Bluffs, IA, USA.
Rodney HandyDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety Sciences, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This narrative study proposes an engineering framework to model a value-based, trauma-informed primary care system. It is based on the premise that effective patient outcomes could be achieved by screening for adverse childhood experiences (ACEs). The protocol involves the administration of the ACE survey and an in-person trauma evaluation by mental health professionals embedded within the primary care settings. The ACE evaluation is then followed by the collection of psychophysiological stress response data. Depending on the level of symptomatic somatization, patients are then referred to appropriate treatment modalities. An engineering-based robust design methodology is utilized to demonstrate a model of a trauma-informed primary care system. To be deployed, the proposed value-based systems model of medicine warrants further investigation with clinical and empirical studies.

Indexed as

Adverse Childhood ExperiencesPrimary Health CareHumansadverse childhood experiencerobust designstresssystems medicinetrauma

Identifiers

PMID41635460
PMCPMC12863106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.