Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41635449›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2026

First Evidences of the Point-Light Display Observation Methodology in Multi-Pathology Care: A Retrospective Analysis.

Victor Francisco, Wejdene Abidi, Zeineb Mnif, Romain David, Maxime Billot, Christel Bidet-Ildei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Victor FranciscoUniversité de Poitiers, Université de Tours, CNRS Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition et l'Apprentissage Poitiers France.
Wejdene AbidiClinique SMR Pierrefitte-sur-Seine Centre de Soins Médicaux et de Réadaptation Paris France.
Zeineb MnifClinique SMR Pierrefitte-sur-Seine Centre de Soins Médicaux et de Réadaptation Paris France.
Romain DavidCentre d'Investigation Clinique, CIC-IT, INSERM CIC 1402 Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers Poitiers France.
Maxime BillotUniversité de Poitiers, Université de Tours, CNRS Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition et l'Apprentissage Poitiers France.
Christel Bidet-IldeiUniversité de Poitiers, Université de Tours, CNRS Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition et l'Apprentissage Poitiers France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4699-179X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aim: This study aims to retrospectively assess the point-light display (PLD) action observation methodology, in order to explore the effect of action observation treatment (AOT) for locomotion rehabilitation in aged patients at risk of falling. Methods: The results of 30 patients were assessed with 10 patients benefiting from conventional rehabilitation program, 10 patients receiving an AOT program involving the observation of PLD representing a young actor, and 10 patients receiving an AOT program involving the observation of PLD representing an old actor (PLD-O). Results: The analysis revealed more progress for patients who benefited from AOT observation compared to conventional therapy on standardized tests measuring daily life actions (Bartel index) and disability in the lower limbs (Short Physical Performance Battery) but only when PLD represented an old actor. Discussion: These results suggest that an AOT program involving the observation of PLDs is a promising approach for rehabilitating patients at risk of falling in a clinical context but matching the motor repertoire seems a crucial factor for optimizing the effects.

Indexed as

action observationAOTmotor repertoirepoint‐light displayrehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID41635449
PMCPMC12862107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.