Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41635377›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

One Year of Low-Titer Whole Blood Resuscitation at an Academic Level 1 Trauma Center.

David A Leon, Christopher M Wend, Zakk Arciaga, Jace Bradshaw, Steve M Frank, Kent A Stevens, Elizabeth P Crowe, Matthew J Levy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

David A LeonDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, USA.
Christopher M WendDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
Zakk ArciagaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
Jace BradshawDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
Steve M FrankDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
Kent A StevensDepartment of Surgery, Division of Acute Care Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
Elizabeth P CroweDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
Matthew J LevyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective Whole blood has shown significant promise in the military setting for resuscitation of trauma patients at risk of massive hemorrhage. Whole blood resuscitation has been increasingly applied to civilian trauma, where hemorrhagic shock is one of the most preventable causes of death. This study describes the natural experience post-implementation of a low-titer O-positive whole blood (LTOWB) protocol for adult trauma patients who presented to our academic level 1 urban trauma center. Methodology This was a single-center descriptive analysis of adult patients who received LTOWB over 12 months, from program start in December 2022 to December 2023. All patients who received LTOWB during the 12-month study period were included. Patients initially excluded from receiving LTOWB per protocol included those under the age of 16, pulseless patients, those undergoing thoracotomy or receiving cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), and women 50 years of age or younger. Each case of LTOWB administration was identified and reviewed, including the number of all blood components transfused (including LTOWB). In-hospital mortality was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included the total amount of blood components used and markers of coagulation. Data were collected from both a trauma registry and a blood bank registry. Duplicate and missing data were assessed by two independent reviewers. Study data were stored in accordance with institutional requirements and analyzed using appropriate statistics. Results From the initiation of the LTOWB program in December 2022 through the end of December 2023, 81 adults received LTOWB in the emergency department (ED) at our center, with an overall in-hospital mortality rate of 23.5% (19). The majority of recipients were African American males, median age 33 (interquartile range (IQR) age 24-45), with penetrating trauma. The median Injury Severity Score (ISS) on presentation was 17 (IQR 10-26). These patients received a median of two units of LTOWB (IQR 1-4 units) and a median of 4 total units of blood components (inclusive of the initial LTOWB; IQR 2-12 units) in the first 24 hours. No life-threatening transfusion reactions were observed. Conclusions During the first 12 months following implementation of an LTOWB protocol for trauma patients, 81 patients received whole blood during their initial resuscitation period for traumatic hemorrhage, with no cases of significant transfusion reactions observed within 24 hours following LTOWB administration, demonstrating LTOWB administration to be safe and feasible in trauma resuscitation. While survival bias may have skewed the impact of LTOWB implementation, assessment for improved outcomes in specific sub-groups within this cohort of patients will be better elucidated in future studies through comparative analysis.

Indexed as

acute care surgery and traumabalanced resuscitationblood transfusion safetyblood transfusion serviceswhole bloodemergency medicine and traumamassive blood transfusion

Identifiers

PMID41635377
PMCPMC12863635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.