ArticleCureus2026
Caudal Duplication Syndrome: A Case Report Emphasizing Functional Assessment in Surgical Management.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Caudal duplication syndrome (CDS) is an extremely rare congenital anomaly involving variable duplication of genitourinary, gastrointestinal, and neural structures. We report a male infant with complete duplication of the bladder, urethra, prostate, penis, scrotum, and colon, associated with a tethered spinal cord and a colovesical fistula. The fistula was not identified on initial imaging and was detected only during intraoperative cystoscopy and cystogram, underscoring the diagnostic limitations of early radiologic evaluation in CDS. Management was staged and prioritized according to functional urgency. Initial treatment focused on spinal cord detethering and resection of the accessory colon to address neurological risk and prevent recurrent infection. Urologic intervention was subsequently guided by videourodynamic findings, favoring a minimally invasive, function-preserving strategy rather than extensive anatomical resection. After functional stability was achieved, aesthetic genital reconstruction was performed to optimize external genital symmetry and reduce potential psychosocial impact. This case highlights the highly unpredictable anatomical variability of CDS and reinforces the need for individualized, multidisciplinary management tailored to functional priorities rather than anatomical duplication alone. Long-term follow-up is essential to monitor urinary continence, bladder compliance, and future reproductive potential throughout growth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.