Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41635317›Full record

ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2025

High-dose postpartum thromboprophylaxis in women at high risk of pregnancy-related venous thromboembolism: a single-center prospective cohort study.

Sean C S Rivrud, Èmese R H Heijkoop, Marloes A G Holswilder-Olde Scholtenhuis, Karina Meijer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sean C S RivrudDepartment of Intensive Care, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Èmese R H HeijkoopDepartment of Intensive Care, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Marloes A G Holswilder-Olde ScholtenhuisDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Karina MeijerDepartment of Hematology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pregnancy-related venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major cause of maternal mortality and morbidity. While thromboprophylaxis can reduce the incidence of VTE, it may increase the risk of bleeding. Current guidelines recommend assessing VTE risk in pregnant women and administering low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) thromboprophylaxis to those at high risk. However, there is a paucity of evidence regarding the optimal dosing of postpartum LMWH thromboprophylaxis. Objectives: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of fixed low-dose LMWH antepartum and weight-based high-dose LMWH (equivalent to weight-based therapeutic-dose LMWH) until 6 weeks postpartum in a prospective cohort of women at high risk for pregnancy-related VTE. Methods: From December 8, 2014, to November 9, 2023, we included patients at high risk for pregnancy-related VTE who required thromboprophylaxis during pregnancy and the puerperium. The primary safety outcome was the incidence of primary and secondary major postpartum hemorrhage. The secondary safety outcome was the incidence of primary and secondary postpartum clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (CRNMB). The efficacy outcome was the incidence of VTE. Additional outcomes included treatment discontinuation and treatment modification. Results: We found a 6.56% incidence of primary major postpartum hemorrhage, a 9.84% incidence of primary postpartum CRNMB, a 5.00% incidence of secondary postpartum CRNMB, a 3.33% incidence of VTE, a 16.1% incidence of treatment discontinuation, and a 30.6% incidence of treatment modification. Conclusion: When evaluating the optimal dose of thromboprophylaxis, the acceptable residual risk of VTE is debatable but should be considered in conjunction with the risks of adverse events, particularly bleeding and drug reactions, such as hypersensitivity skin reactions.

Indexed as

anticoagulantsheparinlow-molecular-weightpregnancythrombophiliathrombosis

Identifiers

PMID41635317
PMCPMC12861745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.