ArticleBMJ public health2026
Using performance-based grants to subnational governments to improve health outcomes: a repeated cross-sectional evaluation of the Saving One Million Lives Programme in Nigeria.
Article in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Performance-based grants (PBGs) to subnational governments have been used in other sectors to improve the delivery of government services, but have rarely been used in the health sector. This study aimed to assess changes in maternal, newborn and child health (MNCH) outcomes and quality of care associated with the implementation of PBGs under the Saving One Million Lives Programme for Results (SOML-PforR) in Nigeria. Methods: This study employed a repeated cross-sectional observational design. Trends in MNCH service coverage indicators and quality-of-care domains were analysed using nationally representative household and facility surveys conducted in 2016 (baseline) and 2021 (endline). Changes in incentivised and non-incentivised indicators across Nigeria's six geopolitical zones were used to assess coverage and equity. Coverage indicators were reported as percentages, while changes were presented as percentage points. Simple and multivariable linear regression analyses were performed to determine the effect of baseline coverage in 2016 on the percentage point change in coverage for MNCH indicators, with female literacy included as a covariate. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05. Results: Between 2016 and 2021, significant improvements were observed in Penta3 vaccination coverage (23.3% points), skilled birth attendance (7.7% points), vitamin A supplementation (26.4% points) and contraceptive prevalence (7.4% points). However, coverage of insecticide-treated nets declined nationally (-7.9% points). The quality of care in health facilities also improved, particularly in the availability of essential drugs and functional equipment (20.5% points). The data quality and financial transparency domains showed the least progress (7.3% points). Equity improved across the five SOML indicators and was statistically significant for Vitamin A supplementation (p<0.001), Pentavalent 3 vaccination (p<0.001), and ITN use (p=0.038). Conclusion: SOML-PforR contributed to significant improvements in MNCH coverage, equity between states and quality of care in Nigeria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.