ReviewDiagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey)2026
Ultrasound-guided microwave ablation for breast tumors: current status and future perspectives.
Review in Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ultrasound (US)-guided microwave ablation (MWA) has emerged as a promising minimally invasive therapy for both benign and malignant breast tumors. This review comprehensively examines the current clinical status, technical principles, and therapeutic outcomes of US-guided MWA in breast tumor management. We discuss the biophysical mechanisms of MWA, its advantages over other ablation techniques-such as rapid temperature elevation, the ability to create more extensive coagulation areas, and diminished impact from heat sink phenomena-and the critical role of real-time US guidance in enhancing procedural precision and safety. Clinical evidence supports the efficacy of US-guided MWA in achieving high rates of complete ablation and significant volume reduction for benign tumors, such as fibroadenomas, with minimal complications and excellent cosmetic results. For early-stage breast cancers, initial studies indicate that US-guided MWA provides local tumor control comparable with surgical resection in the short- to mid-term, while also offering the benefits of shorter operation times, reduced hospitalization, and stimulation of systemic antitumor immune responses. However, challenges remain, including technical limitations in treating tumors near critical structures, the lack of long-term oncological data, and operator dependence. Future directions involve technological refinements, integration with artificial intelligence and advanced imaging, combination with immunotherapy, and standardization of protocols. US-guided MWA represents an important advancement toward personalized, organ-preserving breast tumor therapy, with ongoing innovations poised to expand its clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.