ArticlePhysiological reports2026
Ultrasound-derived velocity variations predict fluid responsiveness in critically ill pediatric oncology patients.
Article in Physiological reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Ultrasound-derived velocity variations predict fluid responsiveness in critically ill pediatric oncology patients.Physiological reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dynamic ultrasound indices assess preload-dependent changes in stroke volume via the Frank-Starling mechanism and guide fluid therapy. This study aimed to determine optimal cutoff values for ultrasound-derived peak aortic (ΔVAo) and carotid (ΔVCa) velocity variations to predict fluid responsiveness in critically ill pediatric oncology patients. In this prospective cohort, 83 children underwent 88 fluid challenges with 10 mL/kg saline. Fluid responsiveness was defined as a >15% increase in cardiac index, measured by left ventricular outflow tract Doppler after volume expansion. Fluid responsiveness occurred in 54.5% of assessments. ΔVAo demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy, with a 16.3% cutoff (sensitivity 91.6%, specificity 80%, AUC 0.89). ΔVCa showed moderate performance (cutoff 14.2%; sensitivity 79.1%, specificity 65%, AUC 0.75), while ΔIVC was not predictive (AUC 0.56). In mechanically ventilated patients (n = 60), ΔVAo remained accurate (cutoff 16.3%; AUC 0.90), whereas ΔVCa was modest (cutoff 16.5%; AUC 0.74). In spontaneously breathing patients (n = 28), ΔVAo cutoff was 15.5% (sensitivity 95%, specificity 87.5%, AUC 0.89), and ΔVCa was 13.2% (sensitivity 100%, specificity 50%, AUC 0.69). ΔVAo is a reliable predictor of fluid responsiveness in critically ill pediatric oncology patients. ΔVCa may serve as an alternative, though with lower accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.