Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41635005›Full record

ArticlePsychophysiology2026

Respiratory Synchrony and Individual Differences Causally Influence Dyadic Interpersonal Coordination.

Wenbo Yi, Caroline Palmer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Synchrony and Reciprocity in Rhythmic Interaction.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Wenbo YiDepartment of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1210-5312
Caroline PalmerDepartment of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4816-8067

Funding

Canada Research ChairsFonds de recherche du Québec - Nature et technologies 367784Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada 298173
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human interpersonal coordination can yield synchronization at multiple timescales, including behavioral (auditory-motor) and physiological (respiratory and cardiac) levels; yet the causal relationship among these levels is poorly understood. We examine dyadic synchronization at behavioral (tone onsets) and physiological (respiratory and cardiac) levels in music performance, a rhythmic task that requires fine temporal coordination among performers. By perturbing dyads' auditory-motor synchrony or their respiration during joint melody perception and production, we demonstrate the directional influence from dyadic respiration synchrony to behavioral synchrony. Respiratory perturbations impaired both dyadic respiratory and behavioral synchrony, whereas auditory-motor perturbations disrupted only dyadic behavioral synchrony. Furthermore, individual differences influenced dyadic synchrony: partners with similar spontaneous production rates achieved better behavioral synchrony in joint production, and partners with similar resting heart rates exhibited stronger cardiac synchrony in joint production. These findings reveal directional entrainment processes between respiratory and behavioral synchrony, and highlight the pivotal role of individual differences in interpersonal coordination.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionHeart RateIndividualityInterpersonal RelationsMusicPsychomotor PerformanceRespirationAdultFemaleGroup DynamicsHumansMaleYoung Adultauditory‐motor synchronizationcardiac synchronizationentrainmentindividual differencesinterpersonal coordinationrespiratory synchronization

Identifiers

PMID41635005
PMCPMC12868408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.