ReviewBiotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts2026
Bioaugmentation in anaerobic digesters: a systematic review.
Review in Biotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Selective carboxylate production from detoxified lignocellulosic prehydrolysates through bioaugmented anaerobic fermentation.RSC advances · 2026Article
- Advancing climate-resilient livestock systems: Next-generation emission mitigation strategies and integrated technological innovations.Veterinary and animal science · 2026Review
- Designing synthetic microbial communities for enhanced anaerobic waste treatment.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bioaugmentation, the intentional introduction of specific microorganisms into anaerobic digestion (AD) systems, has shown promise in enhancing methane production and in mitigating stressful conditions, particularly in systems operating below optimal performance. This review presents a systematic literature review (SLR) of research on bioaugmentation in AD. This review identified and analysed studies meeting predefined eligibility criteria through a structured methodology involving research protocol, search, appraisal, synthesis, analysis, and reporting. A notable innovation of this review is its comprehensive critical comparison of different controls used in bioaugmentation studies, which has been inadequately addressed in previous literature. To facilitate the functional understanding, strains for bioaugmentation were grouped into the four phases of anaerobic digestion (hydrolysis, acidogenesis, acetogenesis and methanogenesis). A highly diverse set of microbes has been described for bioaugmentation, especially from the families Clostridiaceae, Pseudomonadaceae and Syntrophomonadaceae. Most works are related to hydrolysis. The few works that address acidogenesis are mostly related to dark fermentation. Several studies used methanogenic archaea as well as syntrophic acetate oxidising bacteria, despite the difficulties in culturing them. On the other hand, studies applying strains for acetogenesis were largely underrepresented. Especially works on syntrophic propionate and butyrate oxidation (SPO and SBO) were missing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.