ArticleAntimicrobial resistance and infection control2026
The role of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in the relationship between intestinal colonization and post-ERCP biliary tract infection: a prospective cohort study.
Article in Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPost-ERCP biliary tract infection (PEBTI) is a critical complication influenced by multiple factors, yet the role of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis remains unclear. This study investigated the relationship between intestinal colonization and PEBTI, and whether antibiotic prophylaxis mediates this association.
methodsA multi-center, prospective cohort of 2110 patients undergoing ERCP for biliary obstruction was analyzed. Preoperative rectal swabs screened for common intestinal colonizers. Directed acyclic graphs (DAGs), Cox regression models, inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), and mediation analysis were employed to assess confounders, effect estimates, and mechanistic pathways.
resultsPEBTI occurred in 100 (4.7%) enrolled patients, and intestinal colonization was detected in 343 (16.2%), predominantly ESBL-producing Escherichia coli (73.2%). Initial unadjusted analysis showed a significant association between intestinal colonization and PEBTI (HR = 2.18, 95% CI 1.41-3.36). However, after adjusting for DAG-suggested confounders, the association attenuated to non-significance (adjusted HR = 1.53, 95% CI 0.89-2.66). Mediation analysis revealed no significant indirect effect via antibiotic prophylaxis (HR = 0.93, P = 0.132), accounting for 21% of the observed attenuation. Sensitivity analyses by trimmed-IPTW and stratified center confirmed robustness of findings.
conclusionsOur analysis did not find significant evidence that intestinal colonization independently increases PEBTI risk. The observed associations appear to be largely confounded by patient vulnerability factors, with no significant evidence of mediation by antibiotic prophylaxis. These findings suggest prioritizing host-directed prevention strategies over pathogen-directed interventions in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.