ArticleWorld journal of surgical oncology2026
Anatomical location of metastatic sentinel lymph node and clinicopathological characteristics for predicting risk of non-sentinel lymph node metastasis.
Article in World journal of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
background30 to 70% of patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in early breast cancer do not develop non-SLN metastases. They are exposed to the potential complications and sequelae of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) without gaining additional therapeutic benefit. Therefore, a prediction model for non-SLN metastasis is needed. We identified the anatomical location of metastatic SLNs as a key factor for predicting non-SLN status.
methodsWe retrospectively identified 1,717 consecutive patients who underwent SLN biopsy; 481 SLN-positive patients treated from 2009 to 2019 underwent completion ALND and formed the development cohort, and 113 SLN-positive patients treated from 2020 to 2022 served as a temporal validation cohort. A multivariable logistic regression model was developed and presented as a nomogram. Performance was assessed by discrimination and calibration, and clinical utility by decision curve analysis. The Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) and Shanghai Cancer Hospital (SCH) models were evaluated for comparison.
resultsMultivariate analysis revealed eight independent predictors of non-SLN metastasis: metastatic SLN location, tumor size, multifocality, lymphovascular invasion, extracapsular extension, number of positive and negative SLNs, and size of SLN metastasis. The nomogram based on these variables achieved high discrimination in both the training (AUC = 0.830) and validation (AUC = 0.785) cohorts. In the temporal validation cohort, discrimination was higher than the MSKCC model (AUC= 0.690; P = 0.033) and numerically higher than the SCH model (AUC = 0.716; P = 0.088). At prespecified false-negative rate targets, the model identified 0.9%, 23.0%, and 27.4% of patients as candidates for omitting completion ALND under FNR thresholds of 0%, <5%, and <10%, respectively, and yielded a higher net benefit than the comparator models across clinically relevant risk thresholds. The model also maintained performance in patients with ≥3 positive SLNs (AUC = 0.843).
conclusionsMetastatic SLN location relative to the ICBN is a novel anatomical predictor of non-SLN metastasis. A nomogram incorporating this variable demonstrated good discrimination and clinical utility in a single-center cohort with temporal validation; prospective multicenter validation with standardized ICBN assessment is warranted before broader implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.