Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41634766›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2026

An analysis and optimization model for healthcare equity of medical resources allocation in an aging community.

Qing Wang, Leqi Weng, Jingshan Li, Leiyu Shi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Qing WangBloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, 21205, USA.
Leqi WengDepartment of Industrial Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.
Jingshan LiDepartment of Systems Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Leiyu ShiBloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, 21205, USA. lshi2@jhu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealthcare equity is crucial for providing public medical services. Enabling equitable and timely access to healthcare services is of critical importance to all populations, particularly for the aging population in a developing economy during a large-scale urbanization process.

methodsSurveys, interviews, and discussions have been carried out to identify indicators for healthcare equity. An improved two-step floating catchment area (i2SFCA) method is proposed to evaluate accessibility to health facilities. A mixed integer programming model is used to improve equity. A case study is introduced to illustrate the applicability of the method.

resultsFirst, an indicator index system to measure equity is proposed. Then, the 2SFCA method is improved to consider different needs and preferences of the aging population for acute and chronic diseases. An optimization model using mixed integer programming is proposed to allocate regional medical resources to improve equity. A case study in a central district of a metropolitan area is carried out to analyze and improve healthcare equity.

conclusionThis paper introduces an analysis and optimization framework to study healthcare equity from the perspective of medical resource allocation in an aging society. It provides health service management and urban planners with a quantitative tool to design the distribution of medical resources with the consideration of healthcare equity for the aging population.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesHealth Care RationingHealth EquityHealth Services AccessibilityResource AllocationAgingHumansAgingHealthcare equityi2SFCAMedical serviceResource allocation

Identifiers

PMID41634766
PMCPMC12903635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.