ArticleTrials2026
Evaluation of the protective efficacy of a transfluthrin-based spatial repellent product to reduce malaria prevalence in Uganda: study protocol for a cluster-randomised double-blinded control trial-the Mossie-GO trial.
Article in Trials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06232954 (Evaluation of the Protective Efficacy of a Spatial Repellent to Reduce Malaria Prevalence in Children ≤ 5 Years of Age in Uganda), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of the Protective Efficacy of a Spatial Repellent to Reduce Malaria Prevalence in Children ≤ 5 Years of Age in Uganda: Study Protocol for a Cluster-randomized Double-blinded Control Trial: The Mossie-GO Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundProgress towards elimination and eventual eradication of malaria is threatened by challenges such as the rise in insecticide resistance and low coverage of existing vector control tools. Spatial repellents offer personal and household protection against biting mosquitoes by disseminating repellents into a given area. The trial described here aims to evaluate the efficacy of an active transfluthrin-based spatial repellent device (Mossie-GO™) against malaria in Uganda, using a placebo-controlled, double-blinded cluster randomised control trial. The study's primary objective is to demonstrate and quantify the protective efficacy of Mossie-GO™ in reducing the prevalence of malaria infection in children ≤ 5 years of age. The study's secondary objectives are to measure the impact of the intervention on entomological correlates of transmission, to determine user acceptance of the device and to quantify transfluthrin concentration in the air.
methodsThe trial has fifty-six clusters randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the intervention or placebo-control arm. One hundred children at baseline and sixty children ≤ 5 years of age will be sampled in each cluster at 6 and 12 months to measure the primary endpoint. Each child will be sampled from a different household to avoid within-house replication. A subset of households from each cluster will be selected for secondary endpoint sampling. All households enrolled into the study will be encouraged to continue use of other malaria control tools. DISCUSSION: Trial results will contribute to the growing research on spatial repellent efficacy in sub-Saharan Africa and will inform recommendations for the use of spatial repellents in malaria control, specific to rural and peri-urban contexts in Uganda. Information on household characteristics, behaviour related to malaria exposure and user acceptability of the intervention will also be collected to improve understanding of the intervention usage and impact. Following the trial, results will be publicly disseminated.
trial registrationThe trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov 01/04/2024 unique identification (ID): NCT06232954.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.