Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41634728›Full record

ReviewJournal of hematology & oncology2026

Lung cancer vaccines to enhance immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: evidence and future perspectives.

Zhiting Tang, Linjun Zha, Ruqiang Liang, Tianhong Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of hematology & oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zhiting TangDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Linjun ZhaDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of California Davis School of Medicine, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, 4501 X Street, Suite 3016, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Ruqiang LiangDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of California Davis School of Medicine, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, 4501 X Street, Suite 3016, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Tianhong LiDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of California Davis School of Medicine, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, 4501 X Street, Suite 3016, Sacramento, CA, USA. thli@health.ucdavis.edu.

Funding

BLRD VA I01 BX003895Office of Research and Development I01BX003895VA-Lung Precision Oncology Program CU000157/L0008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed the treatment landscape of lung cancer over the past decade, markedly improving antitumor responses, overall survival, and quality of life. However, durable clinical benefit is achieved in only a subset of patients, and resistance to ICIs remains a major clinical challenge. Mechanistically, resistance arises from multiple, often overlapping processes, including inadequate tumor antigen presentation, dysfunctional T-cell priming and expansion, and the presence of physical and immunosuppressive barriers within the tumor microenvironment that limit immune cell infiltration and effector function. Cancer vaccines have re-emerged as a rational immunotherapeutic strategy to overcome these obstacles by inducing de novo or amplifying pre-existing tumor-specific immune responses, thereby enhancing long-term immunological memory while maintaining a favorable safety profile. Advances in antigen discovery, neoantigen prediction, and vaccine platforms have accelerated the development of both personalized and off-the-shelf neoantigen vaccines. Although personalized neoantigen vaccines have gained considerable attention following the success of mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines, off-the-shelf approaches offer advantages in scalability, cost, and manufacturing timelines, facilitating broader clinical implementation. Accumulating preclinical and clinical evidence suggests that cancer vaccines are more effective in the adjuvant setting than in the metastatic setting, where high tumor burden and an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment constrain vaccine-induced immune responses. Consistent with their limited efficacy as monotherapy, contemporary clinical trials increasingly evaluate cancer vaccines in combination with ICIs or other immunotherapeutic agents to enhance T-cell activation, reverse immune suppression, and restore antitumor immunity. This review synthesizes current mechanistic insights, highlights ongoing clinical efforts, and discusses future directions for rational cancer vaccine development in lung cancer, with an emphasis on overcoming resistance to ICI.

Indexed as

Cancer VaccinesImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsLung NeoplasmsAnimalsAntigens, NeoplasmHumansImmunotherapyTumor MicroenvironmentAntigens, NeoplasmCancer VaccinesImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsAdaptive responseCancer vaccinesICI resistanceImmune checkpoint inhibitorsImmune stimulantsImmunological memoryLung cancerNeoantigensOff-the-shelf vaccinePersonalized neoantigen vaccine

Identifiers

PMID41634728
PMCPMC12896110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.