Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41634726›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2026

The effect of a cervical testing campaign on incarcerated females- a repeated cross-sectional study in Norwegian prisons.

Ann-Chatrin Linqvist Leonardsen, Elin Englund, Ameli Trope, Mona Stensrud, Kristine Breivik, Ragnhild Marie Nødtveidt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ann-Chatrin Linqvist LeonardsenØstfold University College, University of Southeastern Norway, Postal box code (PB) 700, Halden, 1757, Norway. ann.c.leonardsen@hiof.no.
Elin EnglundDepartment of Cervical Cancer Screening, The Cancer Registry of Norway, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Ullernchausseen 64, Oslo, 0379, Norway.
Ameli TropeDepartment of Cervical Cancer Screening, The Cancer Registry of Norway, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Ullernchausseen 64, Oslo, 0379, Norway.
Mona StensrudNorwegican Cancer Society, Oslo, Norway.
Kristine BreivikRøverRadion, Vaterland 28, Gamle Fredrikstad, Fredrikstad, 1630, Norway.
Ragnhild Marie NødtveidtØstfold University College, PB 700, Halden, 1757, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncarcerated women face significantly elevated cervical cancer risks compared to the general population due to higher human papillomavirus (HPV) prevalence, limited healthcare access, and socio-demographic vulnerabilities. Despite elevated risk, female inmates are substantially less likely to receive cervical screening. No studies examining cervical screening among incarcerated populations in Nordic countries have been identified.

objectiveTo examine risk factors for cervical abnormalities, screening experiences, HPV vaccination status, barriers to screening participation, and symptoms among incarcerated women in Norway before and after a cervical screening campaign.

methodsA repeated cross-sectional study was conducted in all three Norwegian prisons with women's wards using a researcher-developed questionnaire. Data were collected at baseline (January/February 2025, n = 77) and post-campaign (May/June 2025, n = 97). The campaign included informational materials, prison visits, and educational sessions. The questionnaire assessed demographics, risk factors, screening history, vaccination status, participation barriers, and symptoms. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and chi-square tests.

resultsMost respondents were aged 25-44 years, serving sentences under six months. High prevalence of risk factors was observed: tobacco/snus use (61.0%/53.9% at baseline) and multiple sexual partners (38.2% reported ≥ 5 partners). While 68.8% had prior cervical screening, only 19.6% received screening during incarceration. HPV vaccination rates were low (16.9%). Primary barriers included insufficient information (22.7% baseline, 33.8% post-campaign), fear of pain, previous trauma, and healthcare mistrust. Approximately one-third reported symptoms potentially indicating cervical abnormalities, most commonly persistent lower back pain (52% baseline, 65.6% post-campaign) and pelvic pain (36% baseline, 40.6% post-campaign). No statistically significant differences were observed between baseline and post-campaign responses.

conclusionsIncarcerated Norwegian women exhibit multiple cervical cancer risk factors yet face substantial screening barriers during imprisonment. The campaign demonstrated limited impact on screening uptake, suggesting comprehensive sustained interventions are needed. Future strategies should address structural barriers, ensure adequate follow-up care, and explore self-sampling approaches to reduce health disparities in this vulnerable population.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerHealth PromotionMass ScreeningPapillomavirus InfectionsPrisonersUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Services for PrisonersHuman Papillomavirus VirusesHumansMiddle AgedNorwayPapillomavirus VaccinesPrisonsPapillomavirus VaccinesCervical cancer screeningCorrectional healthcareHealth disparitiesHPV vaccinationIncarcerated womenNorway

Identifiers

PMID41634726
PMCPMC12955301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.