ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2026
Patient journey with Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease - A German patient survey study.
Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A national cross-sectional study of patients with inherited retinal disease in China.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCharcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) and related disorders represent one of the largest groups of inherited neurological disorders. Long considered incurable, the first disease-modifying treatments are currently being evaluated in clinical trials. However, frequent misdiagnosis or delayed recognition are common, hindering timely treatment necessary to prevent permanent disability. In this study, we conducted a survey among patients from our CMT clinic and the German patient advocate group to capture patients’ perspective on the diagnostic journey and to explore solutions for earlier diagnosis and improved access to specialized care.
results270 CMT patients participated in the survey. The average time between symptom onset and first physician contact was 5.2 years with a symptom to diagnosis time of 13.7 years. Patients who were first seen by an orthopedic specialist had a longer diagnostic delay compared to those seen by a neurologist or geneticist. Diagnostic hospitalizations occurred in 46% of cases. More than half of the patients were initially misdiagnosed, which prolonged the diagnostic journey and impaired the patients’ general health.
conclusionsOur study highlights that patients with CMT in Germany regularly face a prolonged diagnostic odyssey before receiving a correct diagnosis. Lengthy diagnostic pathways involving frequent doctor visits and hospital stays, as well as misdiagnosis, lead to inappropriate treatment, and high emotional and economic burden. Late diagnosis may limit the effectiveness of upcoming therapies that rely on early treatment initiation. New strategies need to be defined to decrease the costs for both patients and healthcare systems and prepare for upcoming therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.