ArticleBMC medical education2026
The Climate Health Curriculum Tool (CHCT): an assessment framework for integrating climate health education in U.S. undergraduate medical curricula.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Medical students' perspectives on climate change, climate-health education, and professional identity: a qualitative study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClimate change poses urgent and complex threats to public health, yet major gaps persist in integrating climate health education into medical curricula. We developed the Climate Health Curriculum Tool (CHCT), an evidence-based framework to guide medical educators in designing, implementing, and evaluating climate health content across U.S. undergraduate medical education.
methodsA transdisciplinary expert panel reviewed and integrated existing climate health competency frameworks with the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) foundational competency domains. The panel utilized structured mapping, iterative review, and consensus building processes to develop domain-specific, measurable learning objectives.
resultsThe CHCT, adapted from the validated AAMC Tool for Assessing Cultural Competence Training (TACCT), organizes climate health competencies across six domains: Patient Care, Knowledge for Practice, Practice-Based Learning and Improvement, Interpersonal and Communication Skills, Systems-Based Practice, and Professionalism. For each domain, the tool specifies learning objectives that can be mapped to existing courses or integrated in new courses, facilitating incremental integration into curricula.
conclusionsThe CHCT provides a structured, adaptable, and competency-aligned framework for integrating climate health into U.S. undergraduate medical education. It addresses a critical educational gap and supports adoption across diverse institutional contexts. Future research should evaluate its implementation and impact on learner outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.