ArticleBMC health services research2026
Is wait a hard word for the patient? The impact of waiting time on revisit decisions in patients with respiratory infectious diseases in the post-epidemic era - findings from fever clinics in China.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn the post-pandemic era, seasonal surges of respiratory infectious diseases in China have placed sustained pressure on hospital fever clinics, often resulting in prolonged waiting times. Although extended waits are typically associated with patient dissatisfaction, many patients continue to seek care at tertiary hospitals, presenting an apparent paradox. This study examines the relationships between waiting time, perceived service quality, patient satisfaction, and revisit intention in the post-pandemic era.
methodsA mixed-methods design was employed between November and December 2023. Study 1 conducted text mining on 595 public comments from social media platforms to identify salient themes in public discourse. Study 2 surveyed 357 patients attending fever clinics and tested a structural equation model to examine associations among key variables. Study 3 used semi-structured interviews to provide interpretive insights into the quantitative findings.
resultsText analysis indicated that public discussions of respiratory infectious diseases in the post-pandemic period increasingly emphasize diagnostic procedures and professional medical practices, with attention to fever clinics intensifying during peak influenza seasons. Quantitative results showed that perceived waiting time was not significantly associated with patient satisfaction (β = -0.018, P = 0.565 > 0.1, R2 = 0.032), perceived service quality demonstrated a strong positive association (β = 0.814, P < 0.001, R2 = 0.656). Patient satisfaction was positively associated with revisit intention (β = 0.631, p < 0.001, R2 = 0.398) and mediated the relationship between service quality and revisit intention (indirect effect = 0.311, 95% CI [0.148, 0.47]). Qualitative interviews further indicated that patients tend to prioritize diagnostic accuracy and overall care experience over the inconvenience associated with waiting.
conclusionThe findings suggest that, in the context of respiratory infectious disease care, patient satisfaction and revisit intention are more closely associated with perceived service quality than with waiting time alone. Patients appear willing to tolerate longer waits when these are accompanied by reassurance, diagnostic certainty, and trust in medical professionals. These results underscore the importance of understanding how waiting is experienced and interpreted by patients, rather than focusing exclusively on its duration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.