ArticleBMC public health2026
Voices from the territory and living care networks: facilitators and barriers to implementing peer support in community mental health services in Brazil.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPeer Support has increasingly been recognized as a key component of recovery-oriented mental health care, especially in low- and middle-income countries, where social participation and user-led initiatives contribute to deinstitutionalization and care in freedom. However, the recognition and funding among peers remain limited. Nevertheless, institutional recognition of peer roles and the provision of stipends or remuneration for peer supporters remain.
objectiveThis study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to the implementation of Peer Support during its pre-implementation phase in community mental health services in Campinas, Brazil, using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.
methodsA participatory qualitative design was adopted, combining field notes, meeting minutes, and collective discussions from twelve Research Management Committee meetings involving co-researchers and researchers with lived experience of mental health conditions, clinical mental health practice and research experience.
resultsThe analysis identified contextual barriers such as over-standardization of care pathways, institutional stigma, and structural inequalities, as well as facilitators including collaborative decision-making, affective bonds, and territorial knowledge.
conclusionsStrategies such as continuous training, institutional partnerships, formal role recognition, and stipends/remuneration for peer supporters are essential for the sustainability of Peer Support in public community mental health services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.