ArticleBMC health services research2026
Utilisation of mobile apps in neurological rehabilitation practice among occupational therapists in India: a cross-sectional survey.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is an increasing trend in the utilisation of mobile applications (apps) and smartphones in rehabilitation. This study aims to explore the utilisation of mobile apps among Occupational Therapists (OTs) in neurological rehabilitation practice in India.
methodsWe employed a cross-sectional survey design, convenience sampling, and snowball sampling methods to identify the study participants. An online questionnaire comprising 28 questions was sent to the participants. Quantitative data were analysed using Jamovi V2.3.32, and the qualitative data (open-ended questions) were analysed using content analysis.
resultsThe study revealed that 42% of OTs working in neurological rehabilitation practice in India utilised mobile apps in clinical practice. Most participants reported using such apps as an intervention modality (80%) rather than an assessment tool (40%). Client engagement was the most common reason for using apps, and the effectiveness of apps is perceived to be the same or better than that of traditional methods. Despite the presence of facilitators, such as client engagement and active participation, barriers, such as limited knowledge and technological unfamiliarity, were identified.
conclusionThis study highlights the significant proportion of occupational therapists who incorporate mobile apps into neurological practice, along with their perceived barriers and facilitators. Addressing such barriers through user-centric and practitioner involvement can maximise the potential of app-based practice in neurological rehabilitation by occupational therapists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.